Well, looks like a big hoopla is being made about his performance afterall.
Prince guitar solo behind sheet at Super Bowl called phallic
Honestly.... i mean, HONESTLY... if these as;lfkajsdlfkajdf m****f***ing MORONS didn't make such a big deal about it - no FIVE YEAR OLD would have any idea what "phallic" is.
And, even if they did - seeing Prince jack off behind a curtain isn't going to make ANYONE want to go have sex. And if it makes them want to go jack off - MORE POWER TO THEM!
Goddamn... when did we become the holy puritans? I am about to get on a boat and take my ass to England in search of religious freedom because I am absolutely fed up with these unmoralistic stupid scums trying to push their views on me. Just because you call Prince out on being too sexual doesn't make you holy - your shit stinks just as bad.
Anyway, i'm just pissed off. I find it outrageous that we are letting it come to this even. Instead of worrying about Prince and his guitar solo, why don't we worry about the hoochied out barbie dolls we're selling our kids. Frankly, that angers me much more than a guitar performance that my 5 year old would not likely understand.
(Here is my favorite part of the article though:)
Prince's previously most talked-about performance came at the 1991 MTV Video Music Awards, where he donned yellow, butt-baring pants (a stunt later spoofed by Howard Stern). Always eccentric, he famously changed his name to The Artist Formerly Known as Prince, then to simply a symbol and finally back to Prince. He also became a Jehovah's Witness in the mid-'90s.
But Prince's halftime performance, though celebrated, came in a much different cultural environment, where even the fleeting outline of a man and his guitar could, for some, suggest shaded depravity.
"If people want to be hypersensitive, they can be hypersensitive," says Rolling Stone's Edwards. "Those trombones are phallic, too. What are you going to do?"
No comments:
Post a Comment